[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128
From: |
Brian Dean |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128 |
Date: |
Thu, 15 May 2003 15:46:42 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:42:00PM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> Two of them are defined (there's also the watchdog enable fuse in the
> extended fuse bits).
Ah, yes, you are correct. I forgot about the watchdog enable bit.
> However, avrdude masks out unused bits to 0,
> IIRC. So the above would read as both fuse bits (bit0 and bit1) to be
> set (0), the remainder masked out.
The unused bits on mine read out as 1's, not 0's. I'm not sure why
Erick's are coming out as 0's.
-Brian
--
Brian Dean
address@hidden
http://www.bsdhome.com/
http://www.bdmicro.com/
- [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Erick Castillo, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Brian Dean, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/05/15
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128,
Brian Dean <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Erick Castillo, 2003/05/15
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/05/15
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Erick Castillo, 2003/05/15
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/05/15
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Lou, 2003/05/16
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Erick Castillo, 2003/05/16
- Re: [avrdude-dev] programming 128, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/05/16