[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file
From: |
Colin O'Flynn |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:06:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 |
Hi,
> I propose a counter-argument: it makes no sense for *the user* to want to
> program a single fuse byte.
I agree with Eric 100% here. If you are going to be setting the fuse bytes, you
*must* set them all. Otherwise you are assuming the current state of fuse
bytes. Sure they *should* be default, but if someone else had their hands on
the chip it might change. That's the sorta scenario where two months down the
road stuff stops working, and you can't figure out why...
If you are just playing around and want to change one, it makes far more sense
to be using terminal mode.
Regards,
-Colin
- [avr-libc-dev] RE: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Eric Weddington, 2007/09/22
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Colin O'Flynn, 2007/09/23
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Michael Hennebry, 2007/09/24
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Eric Weddington, 2007/09/24
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Michael Hennebry, 2007/09/24
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file,
Colin O'Flynn <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Dave Hylands, 2007/09/26
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Michael Hennebry, 2007/09/26
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Eric Weddington, 2007/09/27
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Michael Hennebry, 2007/09/27
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Eric Weddington, 2007/09/27
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [RFC] Unified ELF file, Michael Hennebry, 2007/09/27