Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Tue Apr 30 2002 23:31:08 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• April 30, 2002
  • Introducing MultiSensit SDK, Chris Nunez, 23:31
  • Introducing MultiSensit SDK, Chris Nunez, 23:31
  • Re: building/installing Python modules?, roth . gnu, 17:01
  • 超勁爆！超� 撼, ���L�ܦh�H� ] �\�A���ݭn, 16:25
  • Re: can't get away from automake on remote machine, Tom Tromey, 14:33
  • Re: can't get away from automake on remote machine, Skip Montanaro, 11:04
  • Re: can't get away from automake on remote machine, Skip Montanaro, 11:00
  • Re: can't get away from automake on remote machine, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 08:06
  • Re: can't get away from automake on remote machine, Ralph Corderoy, 07:54
  • can't get away from automake on remote machine, Skip Montanaro, 07:35
  • Es ist soweit, info, 00:29
• April 29, 2002
  • selam, Serdar Kahya, 21:43
  • Re: (correction) Adding '-nostartfiles' at link stage, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 13:26
  • autom4te.cache?, Skip Montanaro, 12:58
  • Re: How to handle a non-compilable file., Dr. David Kirkby, 11:40
  • Re: How to handle a non-compilable file., Tom Tromey, 11:02
  • Re: Feature request: meta files & wildcards (once again), Alex Hornby, 09:50
  • Re: How to handle a non-compilable file., Dr. David Kirkby, 08:09
  • Re: Feature request: meta files & wildcards (once again), christoph.wiedemann, 07:44
  • Re: Antwort: Re: Feature request: meta files & wildcards (once again), Alex Hornby, 07:36
  • Antwort: Re: Feature request: meta files & wildcards (once again), christoph.wiedemann, 07:24
  • Re: Feature request: meta files & wildcards (once again), Alex Hornby, 05:53
  • Feature request: meta files & wildcards (once again), christoph.wiedemann, 05:24
• April 28, 2002
  • [=B1�=B0=ED]=C0=E7=C5=C3 "�=CE=BE=F7"=C0�=B4=CF=B4�., soho1004, 23:04
  • Re: installing stripped kernel modules, Harlan Stenn, 21:35
  • Re: How to handle a non-compilable file., Harlan Stenn, 20:44
  • Re: How to handle a non-compilable file., Tom Tromey, 20:38
  • ���ο� ����Ʈ�Դϴ�, ���п�, 13:26
  • Re: How to handle a non-compilable file., Dr. David Kirkby, 10:00
  • Re: How to handle a non-compilable file., Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 07:50
  • Re: How to handle a non-compilable file., Dr. David Kirkby, 07:34
  • Re: How to handle a non-compilable file., Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:47
  • Re: *.in strangeness, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:41
• April 27, 2002
  • *.in strangeness, Harlan Stenn, 23:30
  • (no subject), Nobody, 23:15
  • How to handle a non-compilable file., Dr. David Kirkby, 06:19
• April 26, 2002
  • Re: Overriding of automake rules fails, Roger Leigh, 16:52
  • Re: (correction) Adding '-nostartfiles' at link stage, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 14:47
  • Re: Overriding of automake rules fails, Roger Leigh, 14:32
  • Re: Problem building CVS Guile with automake 1.6.1, Matthias Koeppe, 10:37
  • Re: BTW: This is not the last problem, christoph.wiedemann, 09:25
  • Re: building/installing Python modules?, christoph.wiedemann, 09:23
  • Re: (correction) Adding '-nostartfiles' at link stage, Yannick Perret, 09:20
  • Re: Adding '-nostartfiles' at link stage, Yannick Perret, 09:16
  • Re: building/installing Python modules?, Skip Montanaro, 09:03
  • Re: lex & yacc with C++ projects, Ralf Corsepius, 08:35
  • RE: lex & yacc with C++ projects, Robert Collins, 07:59
  • Re: lex & yacc with C++ projects, Guido Draheim, 07:46
  • Re: What's this aclocal error mean?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 07:44
  • Re: Adding '-nostartfiles' at link stage, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 07:41
  • Re: Problem building CVS Guile with automake 1.6.1, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 07:33
  • RE: lex & yacc with C++ projects, Robert Collins, 07:05
  • Re: lex & yacc with C++ projects, Guido Draheim, 06:55
  • per object cflags, Robert Collins, 06:11
  • RE: lex & yacc with C++ projects, Robert Collins, 05:45
  • lex & yacc with C++ projects, Robert Collins, 05:18
  • Problem building CVS Guile with automake 1.6.1, Matthias Koeppe, 05:03
  • Re: BTW: This is not the last problem, christoph.wiedemann, 04:52
  • Re: BTW: This is not the last problem, David Faure, 04:40
  • Re: building/installing Python modules?, christoph.wiedemann, 04:24
  • Adding '-nostartfiles' at link stage, Yannick Perret, 04:06
  • Re: BTW: This is not the last problem, Adriaan de Groot, 03:59
  • Re: INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG is apparently hardwired., Harlan Stenn, 02:06
  • INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG is apparently hardwired., Harlan Stenn, 01:55
  • Re: BTW: This is not the last problem, Tom Tromey, 01:40
• April 25, 2002
  • Re: Incorrect warning, Zaufi, 19:06
  • Unique Naming Scheme, Calvin Arndt, 19:04
  • What's this aclocal error mean?, Skip Montanaro, 18:30
  • Incorrect warning, Zaufi, 15:29
  • missing icons: Many thanks! That's the correct explanation!, Joerg Anders, 13:09
  • Re: building/installing Python modules?, Skip Montanaro, 12:14
  • Re: BTW: This is not the last problem, Richard Boulton, 09:40
  • Re: Automake a case study, Calvin Arndt, 07:01
  • Re: Automake vs. autoheader: config.h.in, Akim Demaille, 06:48
  • Re: Automake vs. autoheader: config.h.in, Akim Demaille, 06:47
  • Re: automake-1.6.1: both developers try their fixes, Akim Demaille, 06:15
  • BTW: This is not the last problem, Joerg Anders, 06:02
  • Re: automake-1.6.1: nothing helps, Joerg Anders, 05:37
  • Re: building/installing Python modules?, christoph.wiedemann, 04:33
  • Re: automake-1.6.1: both developers try their fixes, David Faure, 04:08
• April 24, 2002
  • Re: building/installing Python modules?, Skip Montanaro, 21:19
  • Re: newbie help, Tom Tromey, 20:11
  • Re: Automake a case study, Tom Tromey, 20:09
  • Re: building/installing Python modules?, Tom Tromey, 19:58
  • Re: InterScan NT Alert (bogus), Tom Tromey, 19:54
  • Re: automake-1.6.1: both developers try their fixes, Tom Tromey, 19:40
  • Re: Automake vs. autoheader: config.h.in, Tom Tromey, 19:37
  • Re: How can I install files to specific location?, Tom Tromey, 19:33
  • Automake vs. autoheader: config.h.in, Paul D. Smith, 18:53
  • Re: automake-1.6.1: both developers try their fixes, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:12
  • problem (fwd), David Churches, 10:28
  • problem, David Churches, 09:17
  • Albumler hazir, piyanist, 09:09
  • How can I install files to specific location?, Dr. David Kirkby, 07:10
  • Quality conferencing at a low cost, Customer Service, 04:28
  • automake-1.6.1: both developers try their fixes, Joerg Anders, 03:02
• April 23, 2002
  • Le dernier sondage avant les éléctions présidentielles 2002 !, SondageExpress, 18:13
  • Re: Thanks! And question!, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 13:01
  • Thanks! And question!, Joerg Anders, 11:06
  • Re: automake1.4/1.6.1 more precise, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 10:47
  • automake1.4/1.6.1 more precise, Joerg Anders, 10:17
  • RE: non-recursive project example, Robert Collins, 09:05
  • Re: non-recursive project example, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 08:47
  • RE: non-recursive project example, Robert Collins, 08:42
  • Re: non-recursive project example, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 08:25
  • RE: non-recursive project example, Robert Collins, 08:19
  • Re: non-recursive project example, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 08:07
  • Re: Automake a case study, Roger Leigh, 07:27
  • RE: non-recursive project example, Robert Collins, 06:40
  • non-recursive project example, Tim Waugh, 06:32
  • Re: automake > 1.4 does not work, Lars Hecking, 06:28
  • Re: automake > 1.4 does not work, Richard Boulton, 06:23
  • Re: configure: AM_PROG_LEX: command not found, Nishio Futoshi, 06:22
  • Re: configure: AM_PROG_LEX: command not found, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:07
  • automake > 1.4 does not work, Joerg Anders, 06:05
  • configure: AM_PROG_LEX: command not found, Joerg Anders, 05:07
  • Re: building/installing Python modules?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:07
  • RE: Creting extra executables., Robert Collins, 04:35
  • Re: automake -a -f does not help, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:34
  • Creting extra executables., Dr. David Kirkby, 04:21
  • automake -a -f does not help, Joerg Anders, 03:52
  • Automake a case study, Calvin Arndt, 03:34
• April 22, 2002
  • Re: cannot make a simple project, Nishio Futoshi, 15:46
  • building/installing Python modules?, Skip Montanaro, 14:47
  • cannot make a simple project, Joerg Anders, 13:00
  • Autoconf 2.53a is released, Akim Demaille, 10:31
  • Re: Two issues with automake, Paul D. Smith, 09:27
  • toner supplies, FRDzpwcfT, 08:12
  • Re: Two issues with automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:15
  • Re: Two issues with automake, Thomas E. Dickey, 05:34
  • Re: Two issues with automake, Akim Demaille, 04:51
• April 21, 2002
  • Re: InterScan NT Alert (bogus), Allan Clark, 23:20
  • Miss --generate-deps, Paul Smith, 22:38
  • Re: Autoconf speedup, Bruce Korb, 17:35
  • InterScan NT Alert, postmaster, 16:41
  • Re: make install not overwriting progname.conf, Tom Tromey, 15:53
  • Re: Autoconf speedup, Tom Tromey, 15:45
  • Re: Overriding of automake rules fails, Tom Tromey, 15:41
  • Re: installing stripped kernel modules, Tom Tromey, 15:40
  • Re: Chars different from address@hidden, Tom Tromey, 15:37
  • newbie help, Marcel Janssen, 15:34
  • Re: Two issues with automake, Tom Tromey, 15:31
  • (no subject), Nobody, 12:13
  • Kaliteli Videolar, videoguy, 03:50
  • Two issues with automake, Paul Smith, 03:34
  • Re: Substituting during maintainer package builds, Paul D. Smith, 03:12
• April 20, 2002
  • 富硒蔬菜简介, Îø±¦21, 20:01
  • Chars different from address@hidden, Josef Spillner, 14:29
• April 19, 2002
  • Koala International Wireless, Inc.(NASDAQ OTC BULLETIN BOARD: KIWI)Shares: ATTRACTIVE, infonet, 18:35
  • Koala International Wireless, Inc.(NASDAQ OTC BULLETIN BOARD: KIWI)Shares: ATTRACTIVE, infonet, 16:09
  • Koala International Wireless, Inc.(NASDAQ OTC BULLETIN BOARD: KIWI)Shares: ATTRACTIVE, infonet, 12:36
  • Koala International Wireless, Inc.(NASDAQ OTC BULLETIN BOARD: KIWI)Shares: ATTRACTIVE, infonet, 02:42
  • Koala International Wireless, Inc.(NASDAQ OTC BULLETIN BOARD: KIWI)Shares: ATTRACTIVE, infonet, 01:55
  • installing stripped kernel modules, Harlan Stenn, 01:29
• April 18, 2002
  • 60 Million Email Addresses $30, 30 Euros, �20, Bulk Email CD, 22:11
  • What's going on here ? I'm confused., Dr. David Kirkby, 16:49
  • Re: automake and AC_CONFIG_FILES($foo), Harlan Stenn, 13:52
  • Re: Autoconf speedup, Zdenek Kabelac, 11:55
  • Overriding of automake rules fails, Roger Leigh, 07:17
  • Re: automake and AC_CONFIG_FILES($foo), Akim Demaille, 06:29
  • Re: automake and AC_CONFIG_FILES($foo), Akim Demaille, 06:19
  • RE: FW: sed: 33: conftest.s1: unescaped newline inside substitutepattern, Robert Collins, 06:03
  • Re: FW: sed: 33: conftest.s1: unescaped newline inside substitute pattern, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:57
  • FW: sed: 33: conftest.s1: unescaped newline inside substitute pattern, Robert Collins, 04:33
• April 17, 2002
  • REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE, Simkosi Jacobs, 11:53
  • RE: make install not overwriting progname.conf, Robert Collins, 07:05
  • Re: make install not overwriting progname.conf, Roger Leigh, 06:53
  • make install not overwriting progname.conf, Lucas Nussbaum, 06:42
  • [ÎÆͱ] µµ´ëü e-mail ±¤°í°¡ ¹«¾ùÀ̱淡....., joensaram, 04:45
• April 16, 2002
  • automake and AC_CONFIG_FILES($foo), Harlan Stenn, 18:20
  • Re: first time automaking question, Eric Siegerman, 12:21
  • automake: /tmp/examplelib-0.2.0/examplelib-0.2.0.am: `/tmp/examplelib-0.2.0/examplelib-0.2.0.am' does not exist, Ben Martin, 10:57
  • Re: first time automaking question, Sean Finney, 00:29
• April 15, 2002
  • Re: Mostly similar library generation, Harlan Stenn, 23:38
  • Re: Large project support, Boehne, Robert, 19:47
  • CONGRATULATIONS!! YOU WON!!, syndy cash, 17:12
  • Re: Mostly similar library generation, Bruce Korb, 12:48
  • [PATCH] automake rules fail to make y.tab.h if y.tab.c exists, Bernd Jendrissek, 10:02
  • Mostly similar library generation, Harlan Stenn, 02:04
• April 14, 2002
  • Re: .la files from outside the current project, Tom Tromey, 19:50
  • An Invitation from address@hidden, lisa, 11:15
  • An Invitation from address@hidden, lisa, 11:15
  • RE: nobase_ room for improvement, Robert Collins, 06:49
  • Re: renaming configure.{in,ac}?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:17
  • Re: nobase_ room for improvement, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:14
  • .la files from outside the current project, Robert Collins, 01:02
• April 13, 2002
  • RE: nobase_ room for improvement, Robert Collins, 22:34
  • Re: nobase_ room for improvement, Tom Tromey, 20:36
  • Re: Seeking simple example for "shallow" tree, Tom Tromey, 15:27
  • Re: make install doesn't?, Tom Tromey, 15:17
  • Re: make install doesn't?, Tom Tromey, 15:15
  • Re: make install doesn't?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 14:03
  • Re: make install doesn't?, Bruce Korb, 13:25
  • Re: distcheck with libtool, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 12:47
  • distcheck with libtool, Robert Collins, 10:01
  • nobase_ room for improvement, Robert Collins, 06:20
  • Re: make install doesn't?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:59
  • RE: Seeking simple example for "shallow" tree, Robert Collins, 00:32
  • renaming configure.{in,ac}?, Harlan Stenn, 00:02
• April 12, 2002
  • Binlerce Mp3 indirin:, sydney82, 23:35
  • Natural Not Viagra - Half Off 9732mgQS0-747rCks2798eTla5-3-26, 2001noworder3456a31, 22:49
  • RE: Large project support, Robert Collins, 22:13
  • RE: maintainer mode, Robert Collins, 22:11
  • RE: Large project support, Robert Collins, 22:00
  • Re: Seeking simple example for "shallow" tree, Bruce Korb, 20:59
  • Re: Substitutions in _SOURCES, Bruce Korb, 20:55
  • Re: Seeking simple example for "shallow" tree, Ian Pilcher, 20:45
  • Re: make install doesn't?, Bruce Korb, 20:42
  • Re: make install doesn't?, Bruce Korb, 20:29
  • Re: Large project support, Tom Tromey, 17:20
  • Re: maintainer mode, Tom Tromey, 17:11
  • Re: make install doesn't?, Tom Tromey, 17:06
  • Re: Substitutions in _SOURCES, Tom Tromey, 17:01
  • Re: maintainer mode, Tom Tromey, 16:56
  • Re: Seeking simple example for "shallow" tree, Tom Tromey, 16:55
  • Re: Substitutions in _SOURCES, Richard Boulton, 15:39
  • Seeking simple example for "shallow" tree, Ian Pilcher, 14:27
  • Re: Substitutions in _SOURCES, Timo K Suoranta, 13:26
  • Re: maintainer mode, Roger Leigh, 13:17
  • Substitutions in _SOURCES, Philipp Thomas, 12:47
  • motorcycle, Mr . wang, 09:39
  • Hurra!, Norbert, 08:49
  • Re: maintainer mode, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:12
  • Re: maintainer mode, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:40
  • Re: make install doesn't?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:59
  • RE: maintainer mode, Robert Collins, 01:43
  • make install doesn't?, Bruce Korb, 01:02
• April 11, 2002
  • Re: maintainer mode, Bruce Korb, 23:20
  • Re: maintainer mode, Roger Leigh, 17:44
  • Re: maintainer mode, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:37
  • Re: maintainer mode, Russ Allbery, 17:29
  • Re: maintainer mode, Andy M. Helten, 16:18
  • Re: maintainer mode, Andy M. Helten, 16:18
  • Re: maintainer mode, Eric Siegerman, 15:54
  • Re: maintainer mode, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:22
  • Re: maintainer mode (Was: Re: first time automaking question), Chadwick A. McHenry, 14:16
  • maintainer mode (Was: Re: first time automaking question), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 12:10
  • I noticed your email -, g5hj6k7, 11:27
  • Re: first time automaking question, Chadwick A. McHenry, 11:08
  • Re: first time automaking question, Steve M. Robbins, 09:33
  • Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:02
  • RE: Large project support, Robert Collins, 05:59
  • Automake 1.6.1 release., Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:50
  • Re: Large project support, Timo K Suoranta, 03:41
  • Re: Large project support, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 02:55
  • Re: first time automaking question, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 02:49
• April 10, 2002
  • Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool, Skip Montanaro, 16:13
  • Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool, Richard Boulton, 14:22
  • Re: first time automaking question, Sean Finney, 14:15
  • Re: Large project support, Richard Boulton, 14:00
  • Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool, Skip Montanaro, 13:37
  • Re: Large project support, Tom Tromey, 13:24
  • Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool, Tom Tromey, 13:20
  • Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 13:09
  • automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool, Skip Montanaro, 11:55
  • ContactMyFriends uxq, fvlContactMyFriends, 10:50
  • ^,.^ 천자문 일일 학습 무료! -광-고-, ���ڿʹ���, 07:45
  • Best Business Opportunity of the Decade!, address@hidden, 05:10
  • Re: Large project support, Timo K Suoranta, 04:14
  • Re: Building library, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 03:39
  • Re: first time automaking question, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 03:34
  • Re: Large project support, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 03:17
• April 09, 2002
  • Re: Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files, joachim.j.gloger, 13:37
  • first time automaking question, Sean Finney, 13:03
  • Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 11:24
  • Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 09:49
  • Re: Re: Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files, joachim.j.gloger, 08:05
  • Re: Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files, F J Franklin, 07:39
  • Re: Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files, joachim.j.gloger, 07:31
  • Re: automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:58
• April 08, 2002
  • Large project support, Timo K Suoranta, 15:02
  • automake dependencies, missing *.Plo files, joachim.j.gloger, 11:34
• April 07, 2002
  • Hello ;o), Falkkor, 22:23
  • TV/Uydu Yayinlarina Artik Sifre Kisitlamasi Yok! -yryscyav, dwhapkoe, 16:26
  • Re: automake 1.6 test failures, Dave Brondsema, 15:48
  • Re: automake 1.6 test failures, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 15:24
  • (no subject), automake-admin, 04:27
• April 06, 2002
  • [����]������� �Ƹ�����Ʈ�� ������!, �����, 22:43
  • Hello, , 18:27
• April 05, 2002
  • RE: `AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS', Robert Collins, 19:23
  • Re: automake 1.6 test failures, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 07:45
  • Building library, BERTRAND Joël, 04:36
• April 04, 2002
  • webTrax.TV! -SUPERIOR ecommerce and web analysis tool!, webTrax.TV, 16:31
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Russ Allbery, 13:24
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 11:44
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Peter Eisentraut, 11:36
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Peter Eisentraut, 11:26
  • Re: automake 1.6 test failures, Dave Brondsema, 09:30
  • Re: `AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS', Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 09:07
  • `AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS', Robert Collins, 08:50
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 07:54
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 05:39
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 05:36
  • Re: automake 1.6 test failures, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:15
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Guido Draheim, 03:57
  • automake 1.6 test failures, Dave Brondsema, 01:38
• April 03, 2002
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Russ Allbery, 17:36
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Roger Leigh, 15:21
  • (no subject), trunks, 14:00
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 12:03
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Peter Eisentraut, 11:46
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Thomas Dickey, 11:14
  • Re: Fail: pr300 (Was: Re: Automake 1.6 Release), Akim Demaille, 08:26
  • RE: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Robert Collins, 08:12
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Earnie Boyd, 07:37
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 03:42
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 03:37
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 03:36
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Paul Eggert, 01:32
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Dan Kegel, 01:29
• April 02, 2002
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Russ Allbery, 23:17
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Russ Allbery, 23:14
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Russ Allbery, 23:12
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Peter Eisentraut, 20:05
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Peter Eisentraut, 19:57
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Eric Siegerman, 17:39
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Eric Siegerman, 16:01
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Paul Eggert, 15:39
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Roger Leigh, 15:14
  • 0505 �Ұ�����, 0505, 14:11
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 11:59
  • Re: RFC: ./configure or ./config.status --clean, Akim Demaille, 11:56
  • dynamic and static libs with same src, Kremp, Johannes, 08:10
• April 01, 2002
  • KONTAKT LENS FIYAT LISTES Lutfen karsilastirin....... -xrgetwog, akdenizgoz_, 14:23
  • Re: shared libraries and automake, Tom Tromey, 11:26
  • Re: shared libraries and automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 10:21
  • RE: shared libraries and automake, Eric Ray, 09:20
  • Re: shared libraries and automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 09:04
  • shared libraries and automake, Eric Ray, 07:38

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc