[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:36:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:34:44PM CET:
>>>> -[{ ($2) >&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD
>>>> +[{ { $2; } >&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD
>>> This breaks Ultrix compatibility (when used as part of AC_TRY_EVAL), no?
>> Ultrix had shell functions?
>
> Yes, according to
> <http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shells/#ultrix11>
>
>> Anyway I agree that this change should have
>> been made separately (if at all).
>
> And likely this issue is so moot because none of us knows anyone who has
> an Ultrix system any more. Right?
That's true, but it could break an AC_TRY_EVAL of something set to exit
1 (instead of false)...
Paolo
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, (continued)
Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/23
Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/23
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Eric Blake, 2008/10/23
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/26
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/26
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/26
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/27
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/27
Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Eric Blake, 2008/10/27