[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE
|
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE |
|
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:37:26 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:34:44PM CET:
> >> -[{ ($2) >&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD
> >> +[{ { $2; } >&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD
> >
> > This breaks Ultrix compatibility (when used as part of AC_TRY_EVAL), no?
>
> Ultrix had shell functions?
Yes, according to
<http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shells/#ultrix11>
> Anyway I agree that this change should have
> been made separately (if at all).
And likely this issue is so moot because none of us knows anyone who has
an Ultrix system any more. Right?
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/23
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/23
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Eric Blake, 2008/10/23
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/26
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/26
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/26
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/27
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/27
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] use a shell function for _AC_RUN_IFELSE, Eric Blake, 2008/10/27