RE: [Ampu-dev] New site sections

[Stover, Michael]

Yeah, this sounds good to me.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Braiden [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:04 PM
> To: AMPU Developers' List
> Subject: RE: [Ampu-dev] New site sections
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 16:38, Stover, Michael wrote:
> > However, it also brings up a point that if a public forum 
> "decides" to
> > initiate a new private forum, someone has to have the 
> rights to do it.
> > Either that, or it needs to be a special kind of "solution" 
> such that, if
> > it's voted for, the system automatically creates the new 
> private forum.
> 
> This system of voting for for a Solution seems like the best option
> here.  I imagine that each Task in a Solution would be either 
> a Task for
> which humans are responsible, or an automated Task.  For example, when
> building a Solution, you might do something like the following.  I'll
> write it in pseudo-code for simplicity, but this could & 
> should be done
> using a GUI, like the macro builder in photo-shop.
> 
>       solution->addTask(
>               new HumanTask("Eat all the chips"))
> 
>       solution->addTask(
>               new SystemTask_NewInitiative(LAUNCH_NEW_INITIATIVE,
>                                               "source more chips"))
> 
> > That sounds ugly, but the alternative is to have a forum 
> administrator that
> > is trusted to carry out the wishes of the voters in the forum.
> 
> Yes, I'd say methods like the voting system above would be much more
> preferrable (and consistant with our approach) than admins.
> 
> > 
> > -Mike
> 
> I think this is in agreement with your other email, which 
> just arrived,
> so I won't reply to that to.  But, let me know if you think something
> remains unanswered here.
> 
> Oh, and: blabbing == brainstorming == good =)
> 
> -- 
> Lee Braiden,
> AMPU Team
> 
> "coding a better government"
> http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/ampu/
> 
> ICQ: 24346459
> AIM: FallibleDragon
>