[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki
From: |
Pablo Rodríguez |
Subject: |
Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:23:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
On 11/11/2013 12:31 AM, Lists wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:56:52 +0100 Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2013 06:21 PM, Lists wrote:
>>> I'm also currently hosting the Wiki and the ViewGIT on a custom VPS,
>>> which needs taking d have done is put own asap. So, it will have to
>>> be relocated. I'll update/re-install Mediawiki and all the relevant
>>> plug-ins when I do it.
>> [Replying to a issue raised by one comment from Chris pasted above.]
>>
>> How about using GitHub for both git and the wiki?
>
> Funds, Pablo? ;o) Plus..
I don’t have a cent ;-).
> - Ricardo Pedroso already has a Githnb version/fork of SWFTools.
But this is a fork, as you mention.
I was thinking of a more “official” repository. Or a more centralized one.
> - Matthias originally chose Mediawiki. When he decided to move things
> around, no-one else stepped forward to host it, so I did.
You are right. Mediawiki is a must.
> - Matthias also holds/hosts/updates the original Git repository. All
> I do is grab a daily update, then layer the ViewGit interface over
> it. Allows for easy - GUI - browsing of the updates/changes.
And if you do that, wouldn’t it be easier to host the code (not the
wiki, but the code) at GitHub?
GitHub enables also another feature I miss from the SWFTools management:
an issue tracker.
I have reported issues in the past I’m afraid they haven’t been fixed.
With a public issue tracker, other people than Matthias can check
whether issues have been fixed or not. An even contribute code.
GitHub also provides another feature for coders: it makes code
contributions easier. Disclaimer: I cannot contribute code myself ;-).
>> Maybe a SWFTools user group could also be useful here.
>
> You are an avid user, Pablo! ;o) There are a few others, where I
> believe the main interest lies with pdf2swf, however is there is
> there really the user-base out there? I feel a survey coming on.
> Maybe I should use as my starting point, an analysis of the server
> logs from the wiki? ;o)
With a user group I meant not an amount of people, but an organization
as the author of the repository in GitHub. This is an example:
https://github.com/TEIC.
I think it could be helpful to make the development process of SWFTools
more visible. Maybe someone wants to step in ;-).
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
- [Swftools-common] about the wiki, Pablo Rodríguez, 2013/11/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki, Lists, 2013/11/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki,
Pablo Rodríguez <=
- Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki, Lists, 2013/11/14
- Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki, Hans J Nuecke, 2013/11/14
- Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki, Pablo Rodríguez, 2013/11/20
- Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki, Lists, 2013/11/20
- Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki, Hans J Nuecke, 2013/11/20
- Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki, Lists, 2013/11/20
- Re: [Swftools-common] about the wiki, Pablo Rodríguez, 2013/11/21