[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!
|
From: |
Samir Nassar |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...! |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2016 14:10:55 +0200 |
On 05/24/2016 06:33 AM, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> Have you remembered I'm continuosly worrying about
> trolls pumping 10-20 millions of dummy keys into key servers?
> It is started...
Is there a technical reason why a keyserver like SKS can't remain
append-only but require that all submitted keys be submitted via
PGP-signed request of the key-owner?
Wouldn't this help mitigate this kind of griefing?
Samir
--
Samir Nassar
web: samirnassar.com
email: address@hidden
PGP: pgp.samirnassar.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Valentin Sundermann, 2016/05/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Christian Felsing, 2016/05/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Robert J. Hansen, 2016/05/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Pascal Levasseur, 2016/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Moritz Wirth, 2016/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Robert J. Hansen, 2016/05/26