Re: [ruby-tut] Source layout question

[Daniel Carrera]

I'd say fr/ too.  I haven't been able to touch the English version lately 
because I am in exam period.  So all my time is taken up studying.

Besides, Laurent is the Docbook expert here.  I'd trust his XML before 
mine. :)

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:24:14PM +0100, gabriele renzi wrote:
>  looking at the cvs sources it shows up that the
> sources in beginner/en have a different organization
> from beginner/fr.
> 
> Given that :
>  -fr/ are _actually_ in xml
>  -en/ should be the "original" sources
> 
> Which one should I copy?
> 
> I'd say fr/, cause I think in the english version,
> possibly, we have too much fragmentation.
> I mean, file.xml->chapter can be a 1:1 relation.
> 
> Obviously, everything imvho, I'll follow whatever you
> say :)
> 
> =====
> icq #69488917
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino
> http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.mobile.yahoo.com/index2002.html
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-tut-developer mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-tut-developer

-- 
Daniel Carrera
Graduate Teaching Assistant.  Math Dept.
University of Maryland.  (301) 405-5137
--
en banc: en banc (ahn-BAHN) adjective, adverb
   Having all the judges of a court present in a hearing.