Re: wget2 | Fedora 40 ships Wget2 as Wget (#661)

[@rockdaboot]

Tim Rühsen commented: 
https://gitlab.com/gnuwget/wget2/-/issues/661#note_2009291689


@Romain-Geissler-1A 
> However both @freedge1 and I did raise our concerns to Red Hat that if we 
> worked at Red Hat, we would seriously re-consider this wget2 move for RHEL 
> 10, as I think some Red Hat clients do use things currently unsupported by 
> wget2 (like FTP) which I doubt will be implemented in any soon-ish future. We 
> did point them at this very issue where you made it clear as official 
> maintainers of wget2 that you don't consider it ready for prime time yet. 
> RHEL is meant to be a stable distro, which will be supported for 10+ years, 
> and I doubt Red Hat will want to backport for years all upstream fixes to 
> ease the compatibility between wget1 & wget2.

Thanks, absolutely makes sense from my perspective. Additionally, @darnir and I 
currently don't have more than 2-3 hours spare time per week to work on bugs 
and user questions (not even thinking about new features).

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.com/gnuwget/wget2/-/issues/661#note_2009291689
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.