[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Next GNUN release

From: Thérèse Godefroy
Subject: Re: Next GNUN release
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 19:06:48 +0200

Le mercredi 14 mai 2014 à 13:18 +0000, Ineiev a écrit :
> > - If the notice has to be renewed every time, why not delete each
> > SSI of the old notice separately, rather than the whole set. This
> > would take 5 commands instead of just one or 2, but there would be
> > more flexibility.
> I don't think such flexibility would be really useful, but it would
> make
> the program more complicated (and dependent on all historically
> injected
> variables).

I don't quite understand why the program would depend on all the
variables. If one of them was missing, say, PO_FILE, it would just
delete the SSIs for the other 3. Of course, a delete command would have
to be added for each new variable. But this notice is complicated enough
the way it is. Another variable (meaning another sentence) would make it
useless because nobody would ever read it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]