[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Next GNUN release

From: Ineiev
Subject: Re: Next GNUN release
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:18:25 +0000

Hello, Thérèse!

On 05/14/2014 07:51 AM, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
- Why don't outdated.html and top-addendum.html use the same variables?

For historical reasons.

- Why does GNUN have to renew the out-of-date notice of translations
which already have one when the original page changes?

This seemed the most straightforward implementation.

- If the notice has to be renewed every time, why not delete each
SSI of the old notice separately, rather than the whole set. This
would take 5 commands instead of just one or 2, but there would be
more flexibility.

I don't think such flexibility would be really useful, but it would make
the program more complicated (and dependent on all historically injected

- Is there going to be a test for OUTDATED_SINCE (or another variable)
in top-addendum.html, to disable the translation disclaimer when there
is an out-of-date notice ?


- If and when this test is implemented, are the already-outdated pages
going to be regenerated to take advantage of it?

They won't need regenerating because the change will only be
in the template.

Thank you!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]