Re: The state QSO Party thread [CO QP files]

[Nate Bargmann]

* On 2021 06 Sep 14:43 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> The WYSIWYG multiplier method was confused by the fact I was entering
> two values in the exchange field--the other op's name and county.  If I
> worked another station in the same county WYSIWYG counted it as a new
> mult.

I may have avoided some of the pain had I taken the advice of the RULES
section of the man page and did more prior testing.  My outcome may have
been different had I used the NO_RST option in my rules file.  I shall
keep that in mind for the future.

I guess it pays (eventually) to edit the documentation.  ;-)

73, Nate

-- 
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."
Web: https://www.n0nb.us
Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature