[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state
From: |
Hynek Hanke |
Subject: |
[PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:52:13 +0200 |
On 27.8.2010 17:03, Andrei Kholodnyi wrote:
> I think there is something wrong with a review/commit process.
>
> It makes no sense to review something which was posted on a list for
> review and then immediately committed in git.
>
Well, if it was commited in official Git, it must have been
so because somebody actually did review it already.
I think what we need is coordination though. To ensure that
two persons are not working on the same thing. I think
as a temporary measure, we should say something like
,,I'll take this'' before we start actually working on the review.
As you know, Brailcom is working on the new website,
which will also have a bug tracking system. Then it
will be much easier to coordinate.
Best regards,
Hynek
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Hynek Hanke, 2010/08/27
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/08/27
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Hynek Hanke, 2010/08/27
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state,
Hynek Hanke <=
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/08/30
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Hynek Hanke, 2010/08/30
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Andrei . Kholodnyi, 2010/08/30
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Jan Buchal, 2010/08/30
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Trevor Saunders, 2010/08/30
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Jan Buchal, 2010/08/31
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Trevor Saunders, 2010/08/31
- [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/08/30