speechd-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state


From: Jan Buchal
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] spd-conf revised to reflect the current state
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:14:11 +0200

>>>>> "TS" == Trevor Saunders <trev.saunders at gmail.com> writes:

    TS> Hi,
    AK> Another question I have... what about an instant messaging
    AK> additional to the speechd list? A while ago Rui has suggested to
    AK> use IRC for it, even planning to set up a channel. Have you
    AK> something settled up?
    >> Hello,
    >> 
    >> we have own wiking communicator which offer chat, audio and
    >> video. We believe that can be useful for our communication too.
    >> It was developed for another project and has be accessible for
    >> blind. For us will be very welcome if the people will use it and
    >> help us with its improvement.

    TS> oh, please, not *another* communications tool the \infty we
    TS> already had was too many already.
No. I believe that you do not know our system and the exact motivation,
so please check it before. The main reason is that our system is embedded
in to web page and the users do not need another applications. Sure that
exist many similar application but the question is why. Yes sometime can
be duplicate work but sometime can have  good reasons. We have our
application developed already and we will offer to another for a using.
What the people will use is of course their decision.

Thanks for understanding

    TS> just use irc or if you want it for something one of the existing
    TS> voip solutions, they already solved this problem, and /work/ and
    TS> /don't/ need to be improved, which is a way to spend my time
    TS> that I have no interest in.

Thanks. In this case is not our offer for you and you can use what you
want.

    >> Of course we understand that someone can have another preferences
    >> but if you will be patient then it can bring better environment
    >> for more others.

    TS> We already have all the tools we need, why should we wait for
    TS> another one when we can just use an existing one. There are
    TS> plenty of interesting problems to work on, but communications
    TS> apps aren't one of them. Using another tool for this will just
    TS> be another app to deal with which is a pain and doesn't help
    TS> anything.
I think that you need more information before you will decide what is
good and what is wrong. Quick decision can bring sometime a big damage.


    TS> best Trev

Have a nice day


-- 
Jan Buchal
Tel: +420242486008
Mob: +420608023021
http://www.brailcom.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]