[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition) |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:32:51 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> What is the process to go ahead with this change? Splitting free JS
> between "is free" (verified at the time of review) for level C and
> satisfies-LibreJS for level B
Th enext step is to see what other people have to say about it.
I'm the one who makes the decision but other people's arguments will
affect my conclusions.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), (continued)
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Richard Stallman, 2024/01/06
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Yuchen Pei, 2024/01/08
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Jing Luo, 2024/01/09
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Aaron Wolf, 2024/01/09
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Richard Stallman, 2024/01/11
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Aaron Wolf, 2024/01/14
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Aaron Wolf, 2024/01/23
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Richard Stallman, 2024/01/24
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Richard Stallman, 2024/01/15
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Jing Luo, 2024/01/20
- Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Fischers Fritz, 2024/01/09
Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Richard Stallman, 2024/01/05
Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition), Richard Stallman, 2024/01/05