Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > In practice, if sites that are 100% free software are not being 
  > recognized by LibreJS, and the way modern sites are put together makes 
  > doing this non-trivial,

What does that mean, concretely?  That argyment, as stated, is too vague to
prove anything.  That doesn't mean you're necessarily wrong, but I ask
you to state the argument clearly enough that we can judge it.

                            then the problem is LibreJS's approach, not the 
  > site.

That does not follow.  There might be something that can be improved
in LibreJS's approach, but "It's hard so give up" is not a good
reason.  In order to consider an improvement we need a specific idea
for what improvement.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)