Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

[Aaron Wolf]

On 2024-01-11 7:53, Richard Stallman wrote:

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > My vote is to move the LibreJS criteria to higher grades,
>
> It's not a matter of voting, but that could be a good idea.
> "Satisfies LibreJS" could go in level B, leaving "is free" in level C.
>

Yes, I meant voting as a metaphor, just a way of saying "my opinion/suggestion/preference".

What is the process to go ahead with this change? Splitting free JS between "is free" (verified at the time of review) for level C and satisfies-LibreJS for level B

>   > Is there a chance that the simple fix to the licenses URL link will 
>   > address issues with LibreJS?
>
> Try it and see!
>

Codeberg has now fixed the link and fixed the new-repo link to go to Codeberg docs instead of the choosealicense website. Unfortunately, these fixes did not resolve the LibreJS flagging.