Re: Please review codeberg.org

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > I filled in B2 based on answer to Q9 at 
  > 
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00005.html. 
There's 
  > also Q13 but that is for A2.

I can't access messages easily using those URLs.  Would you please
identify the message by its From: field and its Date; field?
With those, I can find it quickly.

  > I'm not sure if the choice of licenses is discussed elsewhere on 
  > the docs.

B2 is NOT just a matter of "choosing" the license.  Whichever form of
licensing you choose, you must state it clearly _in the package
source_.  If a site doesn't tell people to do that, and give clear
directions to do it right, then it encourages unclear licensing
practices.

  > By the way I could not navigate the https://docs.codeberg.org with 
  > librejs on:

  > > blocked scripts in https://docs.codeberg.org/:
  > > 
  > > https://docs.codeberg.org/assets/js/collapse.js:
  > > 
  > > External script with no known license
  > > https://docs.codeberg.org/assets/js/sidebar.js:
  > > 
  > > External script with no known license

  > Does that mean it fails C0?

I think so.  But I don't know what docs.codeberg.org/ does.  What does
it do?  Is it an important site function?  (That is a judgment call,
not a mechanical decision.)

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)