repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Please review codeberg.org


From: Adam Faiz
Subject: Re: Re: Please review codeberg.org
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 17:32:06 +0800

Yes, but I'm not sure on how to contribute the labels to Codeberg because I'm not sure where the offending _javascript_ originates from, and its license.
Other people have already reported the problem with LibreJS, though: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/64


On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 11:36, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > 7. Is all code sent to the user's browser free software and labeled for
  > LibreJS or other suitable free automatic license analyzer, regardless of
  > whether the site functions when the user disables this code?
  > >Unfortunately, no. Although all the code sent to the user's browser is
  > free software, not all of it is labeled properly. The homepage fits the
  > criteria, but some scripts are not labeled, such as this code snippet(when
  > I visited my repo):

Would you like to report these problems to them?

--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]