[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please review codeberg.org
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: Please review codeberg.org |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:11:00 -0400 |
On Tue, 08 Jun 2021 22:22:53 +1000 Yuchen wrote:
> Only A5 and A+3 are marked as
> TODO. Let me know if I have missed anything.
it is probably acceptable to omit some criteria, at a level
beyond which the forge meets fully - that is the assumption is
made when reviewing notabug.org
ie: if codeberg only fulfills the 'C' criteria completely, then
none of the 'A' could affect it's grade - of course, it would be
useful information on the checklist, if someone does confirm
them, especially in case the forge achieves to a higher grade
sometime in a future review
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, (continued)
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, , 2021/06/09
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/09
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/10
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/10
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/15
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/17
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/10
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/11
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/11
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Adam Faiz, 2021/06/09
- Re: Please review codeberg.org,
bill-auger <=
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/16
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/21
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/22
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/23
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/24
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, bill-auger, 2021/06/25
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/27
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, bill-auger, 2021/06/25
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, bill-auger, 2021/06/25
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/27