Re: [rdiff-backup-users] 25gig files

[Thomas Bettler]

Just a little stupid check:

Make sure your destination filesystem can handle such files. (Of course you 
already might have checked this)

Am Dienstag 03 Mai 2005 03:26 schrieb Clint Silvester:
> dean gaudet wrote:
> >is this with librsync 0.9.6 or librsync 0.9.7?  0.9.6 has known problems
> >with files >= 4GiB.
> >
> >also if it's linux you need to ensure that everything is built with
> >-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 (which it typically is on recent enough distros).
> >
> >-dean
> >
> >On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Clint Silvester wrote:
> >>Has anyone looked at the problem when working on files larger than
> >>25Gig?  Previous messages about this problem were titled "error 107" and
> >>"librsync error 107 while in patch cycle" it looks like a problem with
> >>librsync.  I get this error
> >>
> >>python: ERROR: (rs_job_iter) internal error: job made no progress
> >>[orig_in=129238, orig_out=65536, final_in=129238, final_out=65536]
> >>UpdateError TWDOCS2001.adm librsync error 107 while in patch cycle
> >>
> >>
> >>The orig_out and final_out look like something isn't keeping enough
> >>precision (only 16 bit?) to store the needed amount of
> >>segments/blocks/whatever that represents.  Anybody have an idea about
> >> this?
> >>
> >>Clint Silvester
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>rdiff-backup-users mailing list at address@hidden
> >>http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
> >>Wiki URL:
> >> http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
>
> Sorry, I sent this offlist, Dean.  I'm resending to the list now, too.
>
> This is with 0.9.7, but I don't see it using that in any of the gcc
> commands when it's compiling.  The configure script says
>
> checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no
> checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... 64
> checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no
> ... and further down
> checking for _LARGEFILE_SOURCE value needed for large files... no
>
> Does that look right?
> I can successfully backup files less than 25G.  6 gig, 10 gig 15 gig all
> work fine.  Something just goes wrong at ~25 gig.
>
>
> I've just recompiled making sure the whole thing used
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 by running CC="gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"
> ./configure --prefix=/usr etc. and still after testing this i got the error
>
> python: ERROR: (rs_job_iter) internal error: job made no progress
> [orig_in=84948, orig_out=65536, final_in=84948, final_out=65536]
> UpdateError TWDOCS2002.adm librsync error 107 while in patch cycle Anyone
> tried doing 25gig+ files with this?  The initial backup works fine, but
> trying to run it again to get the differences fails.  Maybe I'll take my
> vacation soon and I can look at the code then.  I've tried understanding
> what librsync is doing, but I am a novice programmer at best so it will
> probably take me some time.
>
>
> Clint Silvester
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdiff-backup-users mailing list at address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
> Wiki URL:
> http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki

-- 
Vorteile von OpenOffice:
- GRATIS
- einfach zu bedienen
- kompatibel
- portabel
Infos: http://de.openoffice.org/marketing/collaterals/faltflyer_11.pdf

Ich schreibe alle Arbeiten damit.