[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jan 2020 16:25:00 -0500 |
Ah, got it. thanks.
ken wrote:
> >Would simply adding more entries to mhn.defaults not work?
>
> Those entries already exist ... so no.
>
> The problem is the default for mhshow is "don't try to display stuff,
> unless it's text". You can tell it to try to display everything, and it
> will do that, but it won't display the part markers (which is something
> Conrad wanted). We didn't envision a case where someone wanted to treat
> an application type as text.
>
> --Ken
>
=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 32.7 degrees)
- text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ralph Corderoy, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Paul Fox, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics,
Paul Fox <=
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, David Levine, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ralph Corderoy, 2020/01/08
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, David Levine, 2020/01/07
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Michael Richardson, 2020/01/07