[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics
From: |
Michael Richardson |
Subject: |
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:36:26 -0500 |
Conrad Hughes <address@hidden> wrote:
> When I mhshow a message with a text/calendar attachment, it's inlined
> using mhical; if the attachment type is changed to application/ics, it's
> suppressed instead. I'm using the latest mhn.defaults from the git
> repo, which contains
Are they in a multipart/alternative ? Or something else?
> mhshow-show-text/calendar: mhical -infile %F
> mhshow-show-application/ics: mhical -infile %F
> .. any idea where I should be looking for something else that might
> differentiate the two?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, (continued)
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Paul Fox, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Paul Fox, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, David Levine, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ralph Corderoy, 2020/01/08
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, David Levine, 2020/01/07
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics,
Michael Richardson <=