[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:27:53 -0500 |
>Would simply adding more entries to mhn.defaults not work?
Those entries already exist ... so no.
The problem is the default for mhshow is "don't try to display stuff,
unless it's text". You can tell it to try to display everything, and it
will do that, but it won't display the part markers (which is something
Conrad wanted). We didn't envision a case where someone wanted to treat
an application type as text.
--Ken
- text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ralph Corderoy, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Paul Fox, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Paul Fox, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, David Levine, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ralph Corderoy, 2020/01/08
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, David Levine, 2020/01/07
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Michael Richardson, 2020/01/07