Re: [CVS] Resource check + autoconf 2.5 + autoheader support

[Jan-Henrik Haukeland]

<address@hidden> writes:

> >
> > I have just started to test the new process functions you have added,
> > Christian. I noticed that when a process is stopped it is restarted on
> > the next cycle. Wouldn't it be better if the behaviour was more like
> > the timeout function. That is, if the process is stopped for some
> > reason then it is not validated anymore and thus not started on the
> > next cycle. The user must explicit start the process again from the
> > command line or from the web interface. What do you think?
> >
> > --
> > Jan-Henrik Haukeland
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:
> > http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
> 
> Maybe it should do both. If you have a process with a memory leak that you
> want to restart at a certain point, this is what you'd want, I'd think.

Yeah, good point. I suggest then that a restart action is added to the
resource-test to do just that, and that stop actually stops the process.

-- 
Jan-Henrik Haukeland