Re: [CVS] Resource check + autoconf 2.5 + autoheader support

[rory]

>
> I have just started to test the new process functions you have added,
> Christian. I noticed that when a process is stopped it is restarted on
> the next cycle. Wouldn't it be better if the behaviour was more like
> the timeout function. That is, if the process is stopped for some
> reason then it is not validated anymore and thus not started on the
> next cycle. The user must explicit start the process again from the
> command line or from the web interface. What do you think?
>
> --
> Jan-Henrik Haukeland
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general

Maybe it should do both. If you have a process with a memory leak that you
want to restart at a certain point, this is what you'd want, I'd think.