Re: [Mldonkey-users] FYI: 2.02-19

[Sergio Bayarri Gausi]

Hello,

> I updated to -19, and I just watched two sources go from a low ranked
> number to a blank status.  One was ranked #1.
>
> Also, Anyone else still have large #'s of blank-name clients listed
> as 'blacklisted'?  Depending upon the file, I can have 30 of these
> entries or 5...

2.02-19 has been running for 5 hours and I have:

Uptime: 19011 seconds (0+05:16)
      Client| seen      |  Downloads       |  Uploads         |  Banned
------------+-----------+------------------+------------------+----------
Total       | 68768     |  228.0  12.3     |  102.1   5.5     |   21   0%
eDonkey     |  9258  13%|  157.3   8.5  69%|   28.5   1.5  28%|    0   0%
old mldonkey|   118   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    8.7   0.5   9%|    0   0%
new mldonkey|  1281   2%|    0.3   0.0   0%|   20.4   1.1  20%|    0   0%
Overnet     |   788   1%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0   0%
eMule       | 57115  83%|   70.4   3.8  31%|   42.9   2.3  42%|   21 100%
trusted mld |   198   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    1.5   0.1   1%|    0   0%

I was previously using 2.02-17 and after 2 days running, the average
download rate was about 6kb/s.

About sources "disappearing", could it be because of a too-early reasking?
I'm thinking of:

1. you download and compile a new cvs version
2. you stop old mldonkey version (sources are saved)
3. you install the new cvs version, copy the ini files (including the old
sources)
4. you launch the new mldonkey version.

What if less than 10 minutes have passed between step 2 and 4? You might
be reasking the sources "too often", and being banned for this. Is it
possible?

Greetings,

Sergio