[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in the documentation, or ...?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bug in the documentation, or ...? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:22:00 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:37:21 -0800 (PST)
> From: nusret <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Cmd is good enough for at least simple tasks. In fact
> even complex things can be done, as the shell is not
> and should not be the real factor here.
CMD is good enough, allright, but some ``complex things'' you do with
it will not work on Unix, because there's no CMD there. I thought you
needed Makefiles that would work on both systems.
Anyway, I think I said this in so many ways that this topic exhausted
itself.
- bug in the documentation, or ...?, nusret, 2006/02/14
- Re: bug in the documentation, or ...?, Paul D. Smith, 2006/02/14
- Re: bug in the documentation, or ...?, nusret, 2006/02/14
- Re: bug in the documentation, or ...?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/14
- Re: bug in the documentation, or ...?, nusret, 2006/02/14
- Re: bug in the documentation, or ...?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/15
- Re: bug in the documentation, or ...?, nusret, 2006/02/15
- Re: bug in the documentation, or ...?,
Eli Zaretskii <=