[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:43:36 +0000 |
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:32 +0700, PHAM ANH THIEN wrote:
> I am running lwIP at sender, so i want after i send 3 packets or more
> than 2 packets i will receive ACK, can i do it?
No, and it makes no sense to want that. Why would you need less
frequent ACKs? It would in most cases just make performance worse.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/03
Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Simon Goldschmidt, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02