Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue

[Kieran Mansley]

On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 11:15 +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> 
> That's probably just a wrong printf-modifier (%d?) that interprets the
> seqno as signed value. I guess in the case of the log, the seqno was
> >= 0x80000000.

Given the other messages in the log though I wouldn't expect the
sequence number to jump that much between packets.

Kieran