[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:15:43 +0100 |
Kieran Mansley wrote:
> > 2. How unacked->seqno is created? and why sometime this value less
> > than 0 as
> > above log?
>
> That looks wrong, it should always be positive as seqno is unsigned.
That's probably just a wrong printf-modifier (%d?) that interprets the seqno as
signed value. I guess in the case of the log, the seqno was >= 0x80000000.
Simon
--
GMX DSL: Internet, Telefon und Entertainment für nur 19,99 EUR/mtl.!
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/03
Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, PHAM ANH THIEN, 2010/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] seq number & ACK issue, Kieran Mansley, 2010/03/02