lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0


From: Sirjee Rooplall
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:07:43 +0200

Thanks,

Are there any good LWIP PPP implementation example software?

Kind Regards, Sirjee Rooplall Figment Design laboratories (Pty) Ltd mailto: address@hidden Mobile: +27 (0)83 230 8466 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Boulanger, Cyrille" <address@hidden> To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 12:57 PM
Subject: RE: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0


Hi Sirjee,

Is there a port of 1.3.2 for the ATMEL UC3A0512 device?
Yes, it's available in a pre-release of the AVR UC3 Software Framework 1.7 here: http://www.atmel.no/beta_ware/

Regards,

Cyrille.
.

-----Original Message-----
From:
address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden
org] On Behalf Of Sirjee Rooplall
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:43 AM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0
Importance: High

Hi,

Is there a port of 1.3.2 for the ATMEL UC3A0512 device?

If no where can I get the 1.3.2 LWIP stack.

I am using PPP, and at the moment I am trying to track a bug
that causes my
system to crash, and when I stop me debugger it points to the
PPPthreadHandle. The failure seems to occur in the function
pppInProc()
everytime.

The change log, does not show any changes to the PPP code,
so I am just
worried that I am going to waste alot more time to get the
port done and
face the same problems.

I have seen in a website that when physical layer is not
present i.e modem
in my case that the pppThread must be removed.
And that implementation of the thread remove used a function called
sys_arch_thread_remove, which does not appear in the LWIP
1.3.0, sys_arch.c
file.

Is there an example of proper use of the LWIP PPP stack that
I can look at
to get some pointers.

The reason I started looking at the memory, is beacuse
normally these kind
of system crashes is related to memory mismanagement or
messed up pointers.

Please bear with me, as I may ask some question which may
seem dumb, but I
am fairly new to LWIP stack, and I am trying to get my head
around its
workings.

The only reason my emails are marked High Priority is because
when I send
emails, I want the server to send them immediately without
any delays, and
it has no relevance to your response time, however I thank
you for you promt
response.


Kind Regards, Sirjee Rooplall Figment Design laboratories
(Pty) Ltd mailto:
address@hidden Mobile: +27 (0)83 230 8466
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Goldschmidt" <address@hidden>
To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0


>
> "Sirjee Rooplall" wrote:
>> seen in website:
>>
http://lwip.wikia.com/wiki/Lwipopts.h#Memory_management_.28RAM
_usage.29
>>
>> However I cannot see where these difnes will be used in
LWIP port 1.3.0.
>
> There have been a lot of changes since 1.3.0, one of them
is moving heap
> and memp-pools to user-defined sections. Like others, I'd
suggest moving
> to 1.3.2.
>
> PS: is there any specific reason you mark your emails as
"high priority"?
>
> Simon
> -- > NEU: Mit GMX DSL über 1000,- ¿ sparen!
> http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>



_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users



_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]