[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0
From: |
Boulanger, Cyrille |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:57:43 +0100 |
Hi Sirjee,
> Is there a port of 1.3.2 for the ATMEL UC3A0512 device?
Yes, it's available in a pre-release of the AVR UC3 Software Framework 1.7
here: http://www.atmel.no/beta_ware/
Regards,
Cyrille.
.
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Sirjee Rooplall
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:43 AM
> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0
> Importance: High
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a port of 1.3.2 for the ATMEL UC3A0512 device?
>
> If no where can I get the 1.3.2 LWIP stack.
>
> I am using PPP, and at the moment I am trying to track a bug
> that causes my
> system to crash, and when I stop me debugger it points to the
> PPPthreadHandle. The failure seems to occur in the function
> pppInProc()
> everytime.
>
> The change log, does not show any changes to the PPP code,
> so I am just
> worried that I am going to waste alot more time to get the
> port done and
> face the same problems.
>
> I have seen in a website that when physical layer is not
> present i.e modem
> in my case that the pppThread must be removed.
> And that implementation of the thread remove used a function called
> sys_arch_thread_remove, which does not appear in the LWIP
> 1.3.0, sys_arch.c
> file.
>
> Is there an example of proper use of the LWIP PPP stack that
> I can look at
> to get some pointers.
>
> The reason I started looking at the memory, is beacuse
> normally these kind
> of system crashes is related to memory mismanagement or
> messed up pointers.
>
> Please bear with me, as I may ask some question which may
> seem dumb, but I
> am fairly new to LWIP stack, and I am trying to get my head
> around its
> workings.
>
> The only reason my emails are marked High Priority is because
> when I send
> emails, I want the server to send them immediately without
> any delays, and
> it has no relevance to your response time, however I thank
> you for you promt
> response.
>
>
> Kind Regards, Sirjee Rooplall Figment Design laboratories
> (Pty) Ltd mailto:
> address@hidden Mobile: +27 (0)83 230 8466
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Goldschmidt" <address@hidden>
> To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 12:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0
>
>
> >
> > "Sirjee Rooplall" wrote:
> >> seen in website:
> >>
> http://lwip.wikia.com/wiki/Lwipopts.h#Memory_management_.28RAM
> _usage.29
> >>
> >> However I cannot see where these difnes will be used in
> LWIP port 1.3.0.
> >
> > There have been a lot of changes since 1.3.0, one of them
> is moving heap
> > and memp-pools to user-defined sections. Like others, I'd
> suggest moving
> > to 1.3.2.
> >
> > PS: is there any specific reason you mark your emails as
> "high priority"?
> >
> > Simon
> > --
> > NEU: Mit GMX DSL über 1000,- ¿ sparen!
> > http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lwip-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>