[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119
From: |
Ken Smith |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119 |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:22:22 -0700 |
I'm using lwip-1.3.0 and I believe I have encountered the problem
discussed here.
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?23119
I am using SO_RCVTIMEO (set to 30 seconds) and occasionally, my
application gets into a loop where lwip with TCP_DEBUG enabled just
keeps displaying:
tcp_slowtmr: processing active pcb
tcp_slowtmr: max SYN retries reached
tcp_pcb_purge
tcp_pcb_purge: data left on ->unacked
I have not been able to reproduce the issue deterministically. I
think it depends on data that my peer is sending me. I would like to
do some testing after applying the patch attached to this bug report,
lwip.bug23119.2.patch. When I do
patch -p0 < lwip.bug23119.2.patch
in my lwip-1.3.0 directory, it claims the patch has already been
applied, it says:
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
And, after looking at the patch, I agree that applying it forward
would get me what I already have. The date for this patch is May 2008
which is after the 1.3.0 release of lwip in March that year. Do I
need to apply this patch in reverse to get this bugfix?
Regards,
Ken
- [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119,
Ken Smith <=
- [lwip-users] Re: Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/10
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Kieran Mansley, 2009/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Kieran Mansley, 2009/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/12
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Kieran Mansley, 2009/03/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, address@hidden, 2009/03/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/03/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/20