[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:04:26 +0100 |
> So all calls to etharp_arp_input are their own critical sections.
> Will this avoid the problem of calling into the etharp module from
> outside the tcpip_thread context? Other comments welcome.
Definitively not, as ARP is also used for outgoing packets. You should try to
fix the problems you have with the 1.3.0 example netif code as that is supposed
to work. I guess you either have a problem with the queues (packets don't get
from input thread to tcpip_thread), or your netif is not initialized correctly
to use ARP. In any case, a debugger and breakpoints will be your friends in
finding this.
Simon
--
Aufgepasst: Sind Ihre Daten beim Online-Banking auch optimal geschützt?
Jetzt informieren und absichern: https://homebanking.web.de/address@hidden
- [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/10
- [lwip-users] Re: Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/10
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Kieran Mansley, 2009/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Kieran Mansley, 2009/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/12
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Kieran Mansley, 2009/03/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, address@hidden, 2009/03/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/20
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, address@hidden, 2009/03/20
- Re: [lwip-users] Patch for bug 23119, Ken Smith, 2009/03/20