Re: [lwip-members] whitespace and CVS commits/diffs

[Jani Monoses]

yes I prefer the current way in lwIP code at least
I suppose you are reffering to David's recent changes
which use tabs.He was not on the members list and I think it's there
that the discussion took place but with this thread
he can have no excuse any longer ;)
Do you know of an indent incantation or Adam's original editor
setting to produce code like the current one?
I used indent -kr -i2 but there were function prototype and other differences
I'll look at that again and run indent on non-conforming sources and commit
if I find the right indent options



> Hello committers,
> 
> 
> the combination of everyone using different white-space settings,
> along with CVS checkins of changed whitespace, really makes it hard
> to peer-review changes made by others.
> 
> Search on "tabs" in the lwip-members archive, we had a small
> topic on this earlier.
> 
> - The idea is to use "spaces only, 2 spaces per indent".
> - Do not allow your editor to change tabs and spaces automatically.
> - Make sure your editor inserts spaces for each tab you press.
> 
> This, and possible committing only non-whitespace changes in CVS,
> will really allow us to diff between revisions in a sane manner.
> 
> Is this satisfactory with everyone else, or do people prefer tabs?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Leon Woestenberg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-members mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-members