Re: [lmi] product editor patch

[Greg Chicares]

On 2008-02-08 22:20Z, Vaclav Slavik wrote:
> Greg Chicares wrote:
>> It would still be nice to use the W3C validator for other files
>> anyway.
> 
> Out of curiosity, are there any problems with validating using 
> xmllint --schema or is it just that the W3C validator is better? I 
> now know that libxml2's Schematron support leaves a lot to be 
> desired, but it's XML Schema validation served me well so far...

We're way past the limits of my knowledge here. I am somewhat
aware that xmllint has a large number of options; I didn't
realize that schema validation was one of them. I mention the
W3C validator only because I'm aware of its existence and have
used it on the web, not because I've tried others and consider
this one better. And I don't even know what schematron *is*.

-- 
  "A man's got to know his limitations."
    --Inspector Callahan in "Magnum Force"