Re: [lmi] product editor patch

[Vaclav Slavik]

Greg Chicares wrote:
> It would still be nice to use the W3C validator for other files
> anyway.

Out of curiosity, are there any problems with validating using 
xmllint --schema or is it just that the W3C validator is better? I 
now know that libxml2's Schematron support leaves a lot to be 
desired, but it's XML Schema validation served me well so far...

> If you can figure out how to fix the lmi defects discussed in
> my previous email, that would be most welcome.

I'm trying to figure out what's going on with the alerts, but nothing 
concrete yet.

Regards,
Vaclav

-- 
PGP key: 0x465264C9, available from http://pgp.mit.edu/