[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Measure Number Collision
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Measure Number Collision |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:02:03 -0400 |
Hi Marc,
> In your example, the rehearsal letters printed twice at the top of the winds
> group. I don't know if it matters that I am on version 2.20
It may.
> Also, if I am reading the code correctly, in a passage where only the brass
> and strings play, no marks would print on that system. The example assumes
> that winds will always be present. That is why I had a MarkLine at the top of
> the score outside of any group.
IIRC, there is a way to avoid that… it involves keep-alive-together, etc. I
just haven’t had time (or need, recently) to research it myself. No doubt
someone else can help you with it!
Cheers,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer (he/him/his)
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: kieren@kierenmacmillan.info
- Measure Number Collision, Marc Shepherd, 2020/10/16
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Xavier Scheuer, 2020/10/16
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Marc Shepherd, 2020/10/16
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Carl Sorensen, 2020/10/16
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Marc Shepherd, 2020/10/17
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Kieren MacMillan, 2020/10/17
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Marc Shepherd, 2020/10/17
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Phil Holmes, 2020/10/17
- Re: Measure Number Collision,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Marc Shepherd, 2020/10/17
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/10/17
- Re: Measure Number Collision, Xavier Scheuer, 2020/10/17