Re: Future of openLilyLib

[Aaron Hill]

On 2020-10-06 8:45 am, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> If \shapeII is production ready, then I'm OK with adding it.  But is 
> should
> NOT be named \shapeII when it goes into core.  It should be something 
> like
> \shapeControl.  \shapeII reflects the history that it came after the
> creation of \shape.  \shape might even be better, but since we have 
> code
> out there that uses \shape but is not \shapeII compliant, we can't 
> really
> use \shape.

\reshape ?


-- Aaron Hill