[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of openLilyLib
From: |
Andrew Bernard |
Subject: |
Re: Future of openLilyLib |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:29:09 +1000 |
What would the difference be should _lilypond_ use LGPL instead of
GPL? I'm sorry, I think the OP amounts to a type of elaborate trolling
of the community. Nothing needs changing.
This has all been gone through. I can only perceive this as an attempt
to damage openlilylib in people's minds (heavens, why?). Really,
enough now.
Andrew
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 16:40, Jacques Menu <imj-muzhic@bluewin.ch> wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> The legal subtleties of public licensing never made their way into my mind,
> sorry for being limited…
> What would the difference be, should openLilyLib use LGPL instead of GPL?
>
>
- Re: Future of openLilyLib, (continued)
- Re: Future of openLilyLib, Carl Sorensen, 2020/09/22
- Re: Future of openLilyLib, Partitura Organum, 2020/09/22
- Re: Future of openLilyLib, Tim McNamara, 2020/09/22
- Re: Future of openLilyLib, Martín Rincón Botero, 2020/09/22
- Once for all and one last time (was Future of openLilyLib), Karsten Reincke, 2020/09/22
- Re: Licensing (was: Future of openLilyLib), Henning Hraban Ramm, 2020/09/22
- Re: Future of openLilyLib, Karsten Reincke, 2020/09/22
- Re: Future of openLilyLib, David Kastrup, 2020/09/22
Re: Future of openLilyLib, Andrew Bernard, 2020/09/21
Re: Future of openLilyLib, David Kastrup, 2020/09/22
Re: Future of openLilyLib, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2020/09/22
Re: Future of openLilyLib, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/22