Re: Clean up embedded scheme parsing/evaluation. (issue 577410045 by address@hidden)

[Dan Eble]

On Jan 31, 2020, at 13:33, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> On 2020/01/31 18:22:47, Dan Eble wrote:
>> On 2020/01/31 17:52:45, hanwenn wrote:
>>> you can do a local alias
>>> 
>>>  vector<> &v = *vec;
>>> 
>>> to aid readability.
>> 
>> The more I think about banning non-const reference parameters, the
> more I'm
>> against it.  Google's coding standards may work for them, but their
> rationale*
>> for this one is weak.  How can we resolve this disagreement quickly? 
> Do you
>> simply have the final say as the project founder?
> 
> Can we have this discussion on a thread separate from this code review?
> I want this code to go in.

Well, you can't prevent people from replying to their email, but neither can 
their replies prevent you from pushing commits.
— 
Dan