move some OLL functions to vanilla LilyPond? [was: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics]

[Malte Meyn]

Am 04.01.20 um 12:29 schrieb Malte Meyn:
> But that brings me to another question: Shouldn’t we add the \dynamic 
> command from openlilylib to vanilla LilyPond? This would allow users to 
> have “p dolce”, “più f” and ‘exotic’ dynamics like “mfz” whithout having 
> to define extra commands using make-dynamic-script.

One could argue that openlilylib can be installed easily but users might 
not want to install “addons” for basic tasks like this. (In fact, I have 
never used openlilylib apart from copying definitions from the 
definitions.ily files and I see myself as a advanced user; I don’t think 
that many newbies will use oll …)

Same argument for \shapeII.