[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave
From: |
inertialwave |
Subject: |
Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT) |
After above helpful responses, I will benchmark and report on the following
serial streaming options:
(1) native windows (presently wired serial device only until original post
is resolved)
(2) instrument-control/cygwin/windows
(3) serialport/sockets packages/windows
For serial data streaming the native functionality has been impressive so
far, although for some sources I have been using system commands to python
script to setup the serial source baudrate, sample rate etc. If
instrument-control doesn't limit performance it could be the choice for
embedded app development.
My streaming Octave application takes ~1ms per sample on my win7/64 PC so
keeps up with 460.8kbaud (wired) with zero missed samples. When this same
Octave is embedded in my (resource-limited) Raspberry Pi
(Raspberrian/Debian) it takes 180X longer- and I am not ready to code yet.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Streaming-Serial-Octave-tp4665537p4665569.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Streaming Serial Octave, inertialwave, 2014/07/15
- Re: Streaming Serial Octave, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2014/07/16
- Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave, Stefan Mahr, 2014/07/16
- Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave,
inertialwave <=
- Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave, inertialwave, 2014/07/19
- Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2014/07/21
- Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave, inertialwave, 2014/07/21
- Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2014/07/22
- Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave, inertialwave, 2014/07/22
- Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2014/07/22
- Re: Aw: Re: Streaming Serial Octave, inertialwave, 2014/07/22