Re: mpi 1.1.1 released

[c.]

On 3 Jan 2014, at 13:42, c. <address@hidden> wrote:

> Sukanta,
> 
> Could you please avoid top-posting in your messages?
> It makes it really hard to follow the discussion.
> In particular I must have missed some message as I don't 
> understand what you refer to in your mail above.
> 
> c.


OK, 

I now found Michael's message (which for some reason 
was downloaded by my client AFTER your reply) and I understand
what you are talking about.

> On 3 Jan 2014, at 13:25, Sukanta Basu <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Michael,
>> 
>> Thanks for catching the typo in the sample file. I quickly created
>> this sample code for testing. The outer loop should have a different
>> index.

I'm going to reformat the code and post it in the bug traker in order
to keep track of the progress.

>> I have to send multi-dimensional arrays in my work. There is no
>> alternative.

well, you could actually try to reshape your arrays before MPI_Send and
after MPI_Receive. This causes a very small overhead and, if it avoids
the emory leak it could help identify the origin of the problem. 

>> Best regards,
>> Sukanta

Thanks,
c.