[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mpi 1.1.1 released
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: mpi 1.1.1 released |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:05:20 +0100 |
On 6 Jan 2014, at 22:34, Michael Creel <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is this new strategy robust to changes in Octave's internal data types? I
> think that Riccardo's strategy was influenced by a desire to make it easy to
> maintain the package so that any Octave object could be sent, and so that if
> Octave added or changed the structure of objects, it would be easy to keep up
> with. I don't know much about this, though, so perhaps I'm way off the mark.
> Best,
> M.
Michael,
AFAICS there's not much difference with that respect in the new strategy,
I was just wondering whether it could have any sort of a performance hit ...
c.
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, (continued)
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, c., 2014/01/03
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Sukanta Basu, 2014/01/03
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Sukanta Basu, 2014/01/03
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, c., 2014/01/03
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, c., 2014/01/05
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Sukanta Basu, 2014/01/05
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, c., 2014/01/06
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, c., 2014/01/06
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Sukanta Basu, 2014/01/06
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Michael Creel, 2014/01/06
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released,
c. <=
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Sukanta Basu, 2014/01/07
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, c., 2014/01/07
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, c., 2014/01/07
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Doug Stewart, 2014/01/07
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, c., 2014/01/07
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Sukanta Basu, 2014/01/07
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Doug Stewart, 2014/01/07
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Doug Stewart, 2014/01/07
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, Sukanta Basu, 2014/01/07
- Re: mpi 1.1.1 released, c., 2014/01/07