[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:47:24 -0700 (PDT) |
>________________________________
> From: Judd Storrs <address@hidden>
>To: Michael Goffioul <address@hidden>
>Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 4:24 PM
>Subject: Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Michael Goffioul <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>Positive criticism is always welcome. But this is not the case here. And you
>can also see that it's actually completely ignored by the main octave
>developers.
>
>
>I agree that Serge might be better received if he sugar coated his complaints
>with positive criticism. But on the other hand, Serge is a long time user of
>octave and he is clearly venting a specific frustration here. IMHO at the core
>Serge is experiencing frustration with debugging after broadcasting. It's
>reasonable to assume that others might be having similar struggles (as I
>mentioned earlier, I love broadcasting but I have had similar experiences and
>I can relate--but I feel the core of the frustration isn't "broadcasting"
>rather it's that the warning messages don't leave breadcrumbs to help you
>track back into the code so you end up microanalyzing everything line-by-line
>for size()). Now, we can choose to dismiss his experience based on his tone
>(and perhaps all Serge was doing is venting) or we can try to figure out
>what's behind this. Serge is a long time user and he's opinionated, but he is
>a dedicated user and he contributes to the help
mailing list.
>
>
>
>
>--judd
>_______________________________________________
>Help-octave mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
>
>
Sergei is rather expressing frustration with Octave's development going in
_strategically_ wrong direction; broadcasting and its stupid (without line
number) warning messages being a clear indication of that direction.
To me Octave development looks convulsive; introduction of broadcasting is just
a convulsion example.
Maybe I'll write an Email on Intel <-> IBM, Intel <-> AMD competition and on
lessons that can be learned from it and how they can be applied to Octave
development.
Regards,
Sergei.
- Re: forking, (continued)
- Re: forking, Thomas Weber, 2012/09/19
- Re: forking, Ben Abbott, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Michael Goffioul, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Dan Muresan, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Michael Goffioul, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Judd Storrs, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello,
Sergei Steshenko <=
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Judd Storrs, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Thomas Weber, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Judd Storrs, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/09/20
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/09/20
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Ben Abbott, 2012/09/20
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Judd Storrs, 2012/09/21
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Thomas Weber, 2012/09/22
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/09/22
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Francesco Potortì, 2012/09/19