Re: Simulink for Octave

[Sergei Steshenko]

--- On Tue, 8/16/11, c. <address@hidden> wrote:

> From: c. <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Simulink for Octave
> To: "Sergei Steshenko" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "xavion" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2011, 5:14 AM

[snip]

> I wouldn't say the scilab interpreter is "inferior", but
> rather that it is less compatible with Matlab syntax as
> compared to Octave.
> c.

'scilab' interpreter truncates identifiers to 24 characters - already
an inferiority from my point of view.

Regards,
  Sergei.