[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simulink for Octave
From: |
Sven-Erik Tiberg |
Subject: |
Re: Simulink for Octave |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:29:54 +0200 |
As i remember you can use openmodula as a substitute to simulink even in RT
applications.
wheter you can create a s-function from octave I'm not shure but probably with
some custom API.
/Sven-Erik
Skickat från min iPhone
20 aug 2011 kl. 01:34 skrev "xavion" <address@hidden>:
> I appreciate the helpful responses. Some background on me... I'm a hardcore
> Matlab/Simulink user for 15 years and discovered Octave a few weeks ago
> after my Matlab student edition could not be installed on my new Windows 7
> 64bit PC. I contacted Mathworks for a quote - $2500 for Matlab and $1000
> for Simulink. After that, I decided to search for alternatives.
>
> I'd like to address some of c.-2 statements:
>
>
> c.-2 wrote:
>>
>> You also must understand that the number of people using Octave makes
>> little
>> difference to Octave developers, in particular none of the money that you
>> state
>> universities and companies would save would go to Octave developers, so
>> your argument
>> does not work to motivate them. Why would they want to spend THEIR time to
>> save YOUR money?
>>
>
> I'd say the Octave developers are spending THEIR time making ZERO money. A
> healthy REWARD is deserved for developing an astonishing and powerful tool.
> My humble recommendation... develop a Simulink-like capability compatible
> with Octave as an open source & free tool. Then sell some additional
> toolboxes at an affordable price. For me, I would not mind paying $50 to
> $100 dollars for a toolbox. If you sell 100,000 tool boxes, that's $10M in
> revenue. Does that motivate you?
>
>
>
> c.-2 wrote:
>>
>> Finally I see no reason why Octave developers would want to "take a bite
>> out of Mathworks bottom line". In my opinion Mathworks offers good
>> products and, if you are OK with using proprietary software, it's also
>> good value-for-money.
>>
>
> You have proven that Mathworks does NOT offer good value-for-money because
> Octave does most of what basic Matlab can do at zero cost. I think you are
> already biting into Mathworks bottom line through shear passion. Its
> catching on at universities and small businesses. Its time to collect a
> reward. My only concern is that Matlab will soon realize this and offer to
> buy out Ocatve. Please don't sell your soul.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Simulink-for-Octave-tp3746480p3756323.html
> Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
- Re: Simulink for Octave, (continued)
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/16
- Re: Simulink for Octave, c., 2011/08/16
- Re: Simulink for Octave, xavion, 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave, c., 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave, xavion, 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/19
- Re: Simulink for Octave,
Sven-Erik Tiberg <=
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/20
- Re: Simulink for Octave, c., 2011/08/20
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/20
- Re: Simulink for Octave, c., 2011/08/20
- Re: Simulink for Octave, c., 2011/08/20
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/20
- Re: Simulink for Octave, Martin Helm, 2011/08/20
- Re: Simulink for Octave, John W. Eaton, 2011/08/22
- Re: Simulink for Octave, xavion, 2011/08/23
Re: Simulink for Octave, Richard Crozier, 2011/08/16